Other
Planning Studies (Sphere
of Influence, Annexation, Local General Plans, General Plan Amendments, Specific
Plans)
| PROJECT |
MAJOR
ISSUES/TASK
|
|
San
Mateo County Coastal Area Annexation EIR
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
1998-2004
|
EIR for expansion
of the District's Boundary and Sphere of Influence. The
Coastal Annexation Area encompasses approximately 144,000
acres of unincorporated western San Mateo County, including
the City of Half Moon Bay, urban areas to the north, and
relatively undeveloped lands in active agriculture and
ranching, low density housing, and open space uses. In
addition to TRA Environmental Sciences, the multi-disciplinary
team includes master planning, economic, and legal consultants.
Lead Agency: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
(MROSD)
|
|
Stream
Maintenance Program EIR
Santa Clara County
2001
|
TRA oversaw the environmental
planning services for the Santa Clara Valley Water District's
(SCVWD) sediment removal, bank protection, and vegetation
management programs throughout Santa Clara County. For
this multi-faceted and long-term project, TRA directed
a multi-disciplinary team that included leading experts
in stream geomorphology and strategies in erosion control
and bank protection. TRA prepared the Program EIR and
worked with a multi-agency task force to prepare multiple
USACE 404 permit applications for interim urgent need
projects.
The Program EIR identified
all of the Programmatic Mitigation Measures (PMMs) that
could be applied to maintenance design (selection of the
most appropriate maintenance method) and to maintenance
implementation (the actual work in the field). The EIR
included a mitigation and monitoring program, a portion
of which was a Mitigation Bank to address offsite mitigation
for cumulative loss of wetlands and other biological resource
values due to the District's five-year and longer-term
work plan.
Under the same master contract, TRA prepared two Categorical
Exemptions under CEQA: one for projects considered de
minimus (too small to exceed significance thresholds),
and the other for projects in modified channels that were
restored to "as-built" conditions. In 1995,
the first year of the project, we prepared an IS/MND for
that year's work, which was considered an interim project
as the Program EIR was being prepared. TRA also worked
with geomorphologists to prepare an analysis of geomorphic
and structural design alternatives that might be applied
at the watershed planning level for areas with a history
of recurring maintenance problems. These design alternatives
offered environmentally sensitive and cost-effective approaches
to reducing maintenance in areas with long-standing problems.
Lead Agency/Client: Santa Clara Valley Water District.
|
Belmont Harbor Industrial
Annexation EIR
Belmont
1993 |
Thomas Reid Associates prepared
an EIR for the City of Belmont on the annexation of 153
acres within the City's Sphere-of-Influence. The unincorporated
area, known as the Harbor Industrial Area, was developed
primarily with light industrial and commercial uses, with
the exception of a mobile home park. The EIR addressed the
environmental impacts associated with the change in jurisdiction
from San Mateo County to the City of Belmont. These potential
impacts included a change in General Plan designations and
zoning regulations which would affect existing and new land
uses, the provision of public services, freeway noise to
the existing mobile home park, and conformance to Local
Agency Formation Commission policies and standards. The
significant issues were potential changes in allowable land
uses due to the change in zoning regulations and the provision
of public services.
Lead Agency/Client: City of Belmont |
|
Brisbane
General Plan Technical Studies and EIR
Brisbane, San Mateo County
1992-1993
|
This project
resulted in several technical studies to support the effort
to update the general plan. These studies provided City-wide
mapping of resources including geologic units, soils,
mineral resources, landfill areas, faults, potential ground-shaking,
landslides and debris flows, liquefaction, plant communities,
sensitive species, watersheds and water resources, flood
prone areas, cultural resources, wildlife fire hazard,
and hazardous waste. The major issues addressed in the
EIR included: traffic mitigation, balance of land uses,
environmental constraints and hazards, toxics, infrastructure
and urban services. Lead Agency/Client: City of Brisbane
|
|
Claratina/Coffee
North Beyer Park Reorganization EIR
1992
|
This
EIR, prepared for the Stanislaus County Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO), concerned the annexation to the City
of Modesto of two parcels of about 150-acres each lying
just north of the Modesto city boundary. The parcels comprise
prime agricultural land, and have been under cultivation
in the past with orchards and row crops on 10-acre farms.
The sites lie at the urban/rural boundary with protected
agricultural land to the north, residential subdivisions
and commercial development to the south and west, and
a golf course on the east. While no development was proposed,
the annexations clearly foreshadowed future development
-- most likely mixed residential and commercial use.
Principal issues for the
EIR were the localized and cumulative impacts of loss
of prime agricultural land, and provision of urban-level
services to the parcel -- water, sewerage, schools, parks
and fire protection. The extension of sewer lines to the
property would probably be subject to an advisory vote
by the citizens of Modesto. The EIR considered the issue
of growth-inducing impact of annexation and provision
of urban-level services to agricultural lands just at
the urban/rural boundary, including the likelihood that
sewer, water lines and storm drain systems extended to
these properties could serve further development, leading
to premature conversion of nearby productive farmlands.
Lead Agency/Client: Stanislaus County LAFCO
|
|
Levinson
Project General Plan Amendment EIR
1992
|
This project
addressed the impacts of a retail commercial/light industrial
complex. The major issues of concern were traffic, hazardous
materials, hydrology, geology, and compliance as a parcel
within the planning area of an HCP for an endangered species.
Lead Agency/Client: San Mateo County
|
|
Gilroy
Hot Springs Resort Project General Plan Amendment EIR
Santa Clara County
1992
|
This was a
spa-resort hotel complex composed of 184 resort units
on a 242-acre site. The major issues included the following:
growth-inducing impacts of zoning ordinance text change,
land use compatibility with adjacent State Park, development
of Historic Preservation Plan for onsite cultural and
religious structures, development of Public Access Plan
with connecting access trails and day use areas between
Henry Coe State Park and the project site, impacts to
Coyote Creek from road widening and a proposed onsite
treatment plant, water supply adequacy, traffic safety,
impacts to biological resources, and fire safety. Mitigation
was developed for exotic species control, oak management,
fire use and suppression, and wild pig management to avoid
conflict with State Park policies. Lead Agency/Client:
Santa Clara County
|
|
Doolan
Road Sphere of Influence
Study and EIR
Alameda County
1990
|
A
study was prepared for the Alameda County Local Agency
Formation Commission (LAFCO) to recommend an appropriate
sphere allocation for 3,185 acres located between the
cities of Dublin and Livermore. The Study Area was comprised
of Doolan Canyon and adjacent land west to Croak Road.
Roughly half of the Study Area was already placed within
Dublin's Sphere of Influence. The lower portion of Doolan
Canyon was unallocated. Livermore City Limits abuts the
unallocated portion of the Study Area. Both cities were
undergoing major planning efforts for the area.
The Sphere of Influence Study
considered existing uses and those planned by both cities.
The ability of each city to extend public services to
the site under a high and low development scenario was
evaluated. The economic and social interests of the existing
Study Area residents and future residents were also evaluated.
The Study considered the merits of several actions that
were available to LAFCO including: No Action, Unallocation,
Partial Unallocation, Allocation to one city or the other,
and Split Allocation.
An environmental assessment
was provided to support the action taken by LAFCO. The
concerned public identified many potential environmental
impacts resulting from development of the area. Specific
impacts could not be identified in the EIR since no development
plan was actually proposed. The primary environmental
impact of any alternative allocating the Study Area to
a city sphere of influence is growth inducement. Lead
Agency/Client: Alameda County LAFCO
|
|
«
Environmental Impact Assessment
|